Analysis on Human Nature

1283 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Topic on human nature

Human Nature

My goal in this paper is to provide an analysis on human nature, from two different philosophical positions, Darwinism and Marxism. First, I will give an explanation of both Charles Darwin and Karl Marx’s individual views on human nature. Secondly, I will provide an objection to these views and explain how a defendant would respond to their positions. Furthermore, these positions will be evaluated to determine which of these is superior. Finally, I will conclude with my opinion on human nature, and my personal beliefs in the matter. To begin with, what is human nature specifically?

Human nature can be described as the general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans. Charles Darwin, the father of the evolutionary theory, believed that human nature could be explained trough natural selection. Darwinism supports the idea of human traits such as consciousness, empathy, and compassion being products of evolution. He contends that these mechanisms, which make us unique, are embedded in our genes, and that evolution has shaped us into a special species. Through his theory, we know now why we share the same emotions, hopes, fears and cognitive disruptions. Karl Marx’s theory on the other hand, focuses more on social behavior and status.

While Darwin’s theory is rooted from evolution, Marx believed that human nature stemmed from our place within a community. Marx argued that humans are always in conflict and that our nature can be measured in a social scale. For Marx, there are two types of people, the rich and the poor, the ones who own the tools for the job to get done, and the ones who provide the manpower or skills to get it done. His theory gave an...

... middle of paper ...

...lso argued on which of the two ideas I thought to be superiors and also provided my personal experience on human nature. I will like to end my paper with a quote from Darwin on human nature:

- The moral faculties are generally esteemed, and with justice, as of higher value than the intellectual powers. But we should always bear in mind that the activity of the mind in vividly recalling past impressions is one of the fundamental though secondary bases of conscience. This fact affords the strongest argument for educating and stimulating in all possible ways the intellectual faculties of every human being. (Charles Darwin)

Bibliography

1) Human Nature: An Introduction to Philosophy, Thomas Wall. Wadsworth Cengage Learning

2) Internet Encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/

3) Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/

Show More
Related

  • Mead And Marx's View On Human Nature

    1311 Words  | 3 Pages

    Philosophy Exam #3 Philosophers have tried to describe human nature in a plethora of diverse ways. Some focus on what they think humans are born as, what their life goals are, or what morals classify them as human. Mead and Marx both focus on the surroundings of certain types of people, and describe how this changes their human nature. In the process, they both describe similar but different human natures. Mead believes human nature is cultural, and therefore can be shaped by nurture.

    Read More

  • Authors' Conceptions of Human Nature

    3888 Words  | 8 Pages

    across all of our written history have discovered the importance of knowing human nature. Human nature is responsible for our definitions of abstract concepts that are surprisingly universal across the western world like justice, equity, and law. Human nature must also be carefully studied in an effort to understand, obtain, or maintain power within society. Finally, human nature must also be carefully understood so as to protect it from being manipulated and to understand its place in society.

    Read More

  • Comparing John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

    1242 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many people have different views on the moral subject of good and evil or human nature. It is the contention of this paper that humans are born neutral, and if we are raised to be good, we will mature into good human beings. Once the element of evil is introduced into our minds, through socialization and the media, we then have the potential to do bad things. As a person grows up, they are ideally taught to be good and to do good things, but it is possible that the concept of evil can be presented to us. When this happens, we subconsciously choose whether or not to accept this evil. This where the theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke become interesting as both men differed in the way they believed human nature to be. Hobbes and Locke both picture a different scene when they express human nature.

    Read More

  • Human Nature as Viewed by Thomas Hobbes and David Hume

    1952 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes in Chapter 13 of Leviathan, and David Hume in Section 3 of An Enquiry Concerning the Princples of Morals, give views of human nature. Hobbes’ view captures survivalism as significant in our nature but cannot account for altruism. We cover Hobbes’ theory with a theory of Varied Levels of Survivalism, explaining a larger body of behavior with the foundation Hobbes gives. Hume gives a scenario which does not directly prove fruitful, but he does capture selfless behavior.

    Read More

  • Exploring Rousseau's Discourse on Natural Humanity

    1559 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his book A Discourse on Inequality, Jean- Jacques Rousseau turns to the state of nature in search of the real “essence” of man. What made humans to be humans? Rousseau is trying to determine the prodigious events, such as the acquisition of knowledge and errors, the mutations that took place in the constitution of the body, and the constant impact of the passions that eventually led to the separation of man between the state of nature and society (67). He describes how as time change, humanity change as well. He figures that if by first looking into the origin of man, it can lead to the “source of inequality among men” and the unnatural ways man has evolved to become (67).

    Read More

  • A Discourse On The Origin Of Inequality Analysis

    1311 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rousseau believes that humans are not sociable by nature because social relations did not exist in the state of nature. Nature did not bring humans together in this state because natural man was robust, physically strong, and independent (Rousseau 2010). But in the state of society, humans start to become dependent on one another and this introduces sociability in humans. The division of labour, the division of classes, and comparison among humans, are the consequences of social relations in the state of society. People are miserable in this state because “social man lives constantly outside himself” (Rousseau 2001: 37). In other words, humans live their life through the eyes of others in this state (Rousseau 2001). On the other hand, both Darwin and Marx show social relations or the sociality of humans as a necessary part of human nature. Darwin sees the sociality of humans as a method of survival; humans need one another in order to survive. Marx, also presents humans as being dependent on one another. For example, the bourgeoisie would not be able to continue to live their lifestyle without the proletariat (Marx 2008). Unlike Darwin, Marx is concerned about the condition of social relations in capitalist society. The bourgeoisie have reduced social relations, such as the family, to economic relations (Marx 2008). He claims that the loss of power in social

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Karl Marx And Kuyper

    1384 Words  | 3 Pages

    Two great writers, whose ideas have been read by many, are Karl Marx and Abraham Kuyper. Marx was a philosopher and because of his writing about Communist many places responded with revolutions. Kuyper was a Christian leader inspired many with his writings about society and culture. Marx and Kuyper both addressed how social issues in the world. Marx and Kuyper’s views of human nature are very different. While Kuyper believes that God shapes our lives and humans have no control; Marx, on the other hand, believes that human beings can shape and control the direction of their own lives. Both men show their beliefs of human nature through history, government, economy, and society. Though they both believe in equal society they don’t agree on the

    Read More

  • Analysis Of People Like Us

    1317 Words  | 3 Pages

    In “People Like Us”, the writer talks about tolerance and diversity in the United States. America has for a long time been cited as one of the most diverse countries. Upon investigation of that statement, one will find that it is a fact, for the country is filled with millions of individuals from different ethnic extractions, political affiliations, religion, socioeconomic status, personalities, interests, etc. However, according to “People Like Us”, instead of the population of the country uniting in its diversity and using that as a strength, individuals are trying really hard to distance themselves from others who are not like themselves, and to band themselves together with those who are like them. David

    Read More

  • Hobbes's Theory Of Political Nature And The Theories Of Human Nature

    1286 Words  | 3 Pages

    Theories of human nature, as the term would ever so subtly suggest, are at best only individual assertions of the fundamental and intrinsic compositions of mankind, and should be taken as such. Indeed it can be said that these assertions are both many and widespread, and yet too it can be said that there are a select few assertions of the nature of man that rise above others when measured by historical persistence, renown, and overall applicability. These eclectic discourses on the true nature of man have often figured largely in theories of political science, typically functioning as foundational structures to broader claims and arguments. The diversification of these ideological assertions, then, would explain the existence of varying theories

    Read More

  • Evolutionary Psychology

    985 Words  | 2 Pages

    The purpose of this academic piece is to critically discuss The Darwinist implication of the evolutionary psychological conception of human nature. Charles Darwin’s “natural selection” will be the main factor discussed as the theory of evolution was developed by him. Evolutionary psychology is the approach on human nature on the basis that human behavior is derived from biological factors and there are psychologists who claim that human behavior is not something one is born with but rather it is learned. According to Downes, S. M. (2010 fall edition) “Evolutionary psychology is one of the many biologically informed approaches to the study of human behavior”. This goes further to implicate that evolutionary psychology is virtually based on the claims of the human being a machine that can be programmed to do certain things and because it can be programmed it has systems in the body that allow such to happen for instance the nervous system which is the connection of the spinal cord and the brain and assists in voluntary and involuntary motor movements.

    Read More

  • My Personal Theory Of Counseling

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    The understanding of human nature is the concept that there is a set of inherent distinguishing characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling, and acting that all humans tend to possess (Winkler, 1996). My basic view of human nature correlates with Charles Darwin’s nature vs. nurture theory. Human nature is influenced by both nature and nurture. Nature is all that a man brings with himself into the world, and nurture is every influence that affects him after his birth. An individual’s morals, values, and beliefs are developed from the nurturing aspect of their life. The environment that an individual is raised in creates their human nature. Then they go through life developing more upon their own morals, values, and beliefs. The nature vs. nurture theory is an every changing concept, and I believe that human nature changes for each individual based on their life experiences.

    Read More

  • Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Simmel: The Relationship between Society and the Individual

    3473 Words  | 7 Pages

    Karl Marx noted that society was highly stratified in that most of the individuals in society, those who worked the hardest, were also the ones who received the least from the benefits of their labor. In reaction to this observation, Karl Marx wrote The Communist Manifesto where he described a new society, a more perfect society, a communist society. Marx envisioned a society, in which all property is held in common, that is a society in which one individual did not receive more than another, but in which all individuals shared in the benefits of collective labor (Marx #11, p. 262). In order to accomplish such a task Marx needed to find a relationship between the individual and society that accounted for social change. For Marx such relationship was from the historical mode of production, through the exploits of wage labor, and thus the individual’s relationship to the mode of production (Marx #11, p. 256).

    Read More

  • Nietzsche's Revaluation of All Values

    2292 Words  | 5 Pages

    We need a critique of moral values, the value of these values should itself, for once, be examined?. [What if] morality itself were to blame if man, as a species, never reached his highest potential power and splendour? [GM P 6]

    Read More

  • What It Means To Be Human Analysis

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    What it means to be human is not just having a face, eyes or a heart.Being human is much more than that, it's deeper and much more .Being human is having the ability to know what is right and wrong. Compelling is the evoking attention in a powerfully irresistible way. Our selfishness, relationships and mortality are one of the many features that define who we are as humans.The most compelling texts that show these feature on what it means to be human ; ‘The Wrestler’, ‘The Road’ and ‘The trees are down.’ Each text displays the portrayal of either selfishness, our relationships and mortality. From this the reader learns about the true meaning of what

    Read More

  • Human Nature in Realism and Liberalism

    1893 Words  | 4 Pages

    Yankelovich, Daniel. "The Idea of Human Ntaure." Social Research, Human Nature: A Reevoulution (The New School) 40, no. 3 (1973): 407-428.

    Read More

More about Analysis on Human Nature

Open Document