Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
role of consumer culture to self and identity
identity and consumer culture
effects of cultural diversity in the 21st century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: role of consumer culture to self and identity
Two significant articles that explore how young people engage with global culture from different perspectives are the UN's 'Young People in Globalization World' (2003) and Arnett's 'The Psychology of Globalization' (2002). In its article the UN takes the socioeconomic approach to examine how young people engage with global culture. They claim that the level of young people participation is divergent and this depends on their financial resources and their location. This gives engagement priority to urban educated people and enhances social segregation between rich and poor. In contrast, Arnett's argues that the psychological aspect of globalization helps youth to form different kinds of identities namely bicultural identity, identity of confusion and self-selected culture. The bicultural identity is the main theme of the mainstream around the world where they can combine their local and global identities. For some people the global culture values weaken their local values and at the same time they can not access global culture, so they form identity confusion. However, the global culture values allow them to choose to build self-selected culture.
Despite the divergence in the two articles approach, there are still some similarities. The UN and Arnett concur that young people engage with global culture via the new technological media despite unequal access to this media (UN, 2003 par 17, 30; Arnett, 2002 par 4, 6). They agree that young people are the main participants on the global consumer culture. The UN and Arnett also argue that the identity formation is affected by global culture especially the hybrid identity (UN, 2003 par 24; Arnett, 2002 par 24). However, they interpret these issues in very divergent ways.
Although the UN...
... middle of paper ...
...t is relay on 'secular' values, but its flexibility allow young people to be religious in order to find meaning for their identity. So as shown above this is one of the main divergences between the UN and Arnett. While Arnett presents the homogenous engagement of young people with global culture, the UN seen this as paradoxical; young people have to included or excluded from global culture.
Although the UN and Arnett have different point of view, both articles play a significant role to explain how young people engage with global culture in relation to how they control and form their new identity.
Works Cited
Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen. 'The Psychology of Globalization' American Psychologist, Vol 57(10), Oct 2002, 774-783. 'Young People in Globalization World' United Nations publication - Sales No. E.03.IV.7 (2003)
Palmer, Tom G. "Globalization, Cosmopolitanism, and Personal Identity." Ethics & Politics 2 (2003): 1-15. Web.
Gardner, Robert, and Wayne Lavold. "Chapter 9-12." Exploring Globalization. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2007. N. pag. Print.
Globalisation is now recognised as a key factor in influencing young people. There have been many connections established between identities and living in a global society. Giddens (1991) suggests that globalisation can be defined as ‘the intensification of worldwide social relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice versa’. Social analyst B...
As Americans we have to start to comprehend that the world around us is changing technologically, politically, and economically. In “The Last Superpower” an excerpt from the book The Post American World by Fareed Zakaria published in 2008. Zakaria emphasizes on these changes. Thomas Friedman the author of “The World is Flat” a piece from the book The World is Flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century published in 2005 also emphasizes on the same changes currently happening in the world. Zakaria and Friedman define these changes as globalization. The obvious common ground shared by both authors is their representation of globalization and the effects that it has and will continue to have on modern life. In contrast to sharing the same main topic both authors take a drastically different approach on how the relay their information to the audience. The differences displayed are mainly due to their personal and educational backgrounds, definitions of globalization as well as the individual writing styles of each author.
The Globalization Reader. 2011. Fourth Edition. Frank J. Lechner and John Boli, eds. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
To begin, this critical response paper will provide a detailed explanation for the significant merit of globalization in context with work or services implementing the dominant western society of the world from other countries that have fewer resources compared to the first world countries. According to Ravelli and Webber (2015) in the textbook “Exploring Sociology,” Globalization initially emerged from Europe when the booming economic industries prepared colonies to transport cheap materials from global south countries to incorporate them with their own resources. This is known as eurocentrism and the help of European globalization has affected the working class or the bourgeois class in the entire world. Furthermore, globalization refers
Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its Discontents. In G. Bridge, & S. Watson (Ed.). The Blackwell City Reader (pp. 161-170). Oxford, U: Blackwell Publishing.
In many cases, the best way to relate to someone is to put oneself in the person’s shoes. However, this may seem difficult for someone who does not share the same experience and the other person, as they may not consider certain obstacles to be as difficult or they may not appreciate certain things which are are highlighted by the person in need to assistance. In an article written by the Global Roundtable Working Group on Youth titled “Youth and the State of Culture”, the author states the importance of culture in the youth field “it is important to understand the various cultural issues that are of great significance to young people worldwide, including such factors as information and communication technologies (ICTs) and media’s influence on young people’s choices.” (“Youth and the State of Culture”, n.d). By being from two different cultures and having experience in both, multicultural Child and Youth Workers are are able to make strong connections between their own culture and Canadian culture. They are also more inclined to find similarities in the other youth’s cultures. For example, Middle Eastern culture in a nutshell is quite similar across all the countries within the area, but it also has similarities with African and Eastern European culture as well. Having a multicultural background is also essential when
(Bilton et al 1996:5) The process of globalization has certainly had many changing effects to the world we live in; it has also changed the way many factors operate. Globalization is said "to have transformed the structure and scale of human relationships that social, cultural, political, and economic processes now operate at a global scale with a consequent reduction in the significance of other geographical scales. "(The Dictionary of human geography 2004:315) Globalization has had both positive and negative effects on a local, national, international and global level. Globalization often brings benefits at one level which cause negative effects at another, these results and the scale at which they manifest are often uncertain and unpredictable.
At a young age, third culture kids gain an expanded worldview by living in a country and culture that is different from their home culture. They observe many geographical differences around the world, and they learn that people view life from different philosophical and political perspectives. For example, people in some parts of the world think of Saddam Hussein as a hero, while people from other parts believe he’s a villain. Western culture is very time oriented, while relationships are of far greater importance in Eastern lands....
In the diverse world in which we live, each country has its own identity and culture. In fact, a culture has its own languages, traditions, customs and social particularities. We can therefore assume that the relationships between individuals change from culture to culture because of cultural distinctions such as impressionism and individualism. Indeed, in a collectivist culture, individuals see themselves as a part of a group, while in an individualist culture individuals are independents from the community. Therefore explaining the differences between a collectivist and an individualist culture with the examples of the United States and the Ivory Coast can help any sociology class student to understand how
The need to belong somewhere, to possess a sense of root and belonging are main elements of the pursuit for positive identity in today’s societies. The present popularity of tracing family history and genealogy points towards this necessity. Identity originates from a person’s culture and corresponding influences on factors such as gender. As Moghissi (2003) says that, identity is usually created in relation to others. International students are exposed to a physical, social and culture environment that is drastically dissimilar from their origin. In trying to be familiar with a different environment, they frequently face transitions in the constructs of their self-identity (Brown and Brown, 2013). these transitions come from their socialization as international educators. According to research, the majority of the educators tend to sustain a strong identity as their country’s citizens. However, there are changes to the combination or the relative scale of their identity constructs. This essay will explain the term identity in reference to overseas learners. It examines how culture, gender and age are likely to influence the concept of international students’ self-identity.
In today's society, with the advent of modern digital communication and an increased focus upon global society and diversity, humans have a golden opportunity to evaluate themselves and how they identify both individually and in their broader culture. Although the question of “who am I” is perhaps one of the classical questions of the human cognizance of identity, our identity as both groups and individuals is directly related to the culture we are a part of, especially in regards to whether that culture is determined to be individualistic or collectivist. These differing mindsets have an inherent connection to the way that we view ourselves and the impact of interactions between different cultures.
Globalization is becoming one of the most controversial topics in today’s world. We see people arguing over the loss of a nation’s cultural identity, the terror of westernization, and the reign of cultural imperialism. Through topics such as these we explore the possibilities or the existence of hybridization of cultures and values, and what some feel is the exploitation of their heritage. One important aspect that is not explored is that such influences can also be more than just a burden and an overstepping of bounds. These factors can create an educational environment as well as a reaffirmation of one’s own culture.
Over the last couple of years, the world has become increasingly globalized. After the cold war, all parts of the world were attracted to the process of globalization. The effect of globalization is uneven in different parts of the world and globalization suggests a world full of persistent cultural interaction and exchange, contacts and connection, mixture and movement. Different people view globalization in different ways. Some people feel it has done more good than harm, while others believe it has done more harm than good. This essay will give a deep intuitive understanding of globalization, world systems, and how globalization has affected society, culture, economics, and politics.