Analysis of Small Class Sizes

1988 Words4 Pages

A Discussion about Small Class Sizes

Introduction

A low student-teacher ratio is often used as a selling point to parents seeking a better education for their children or to pass legislation establishing a maximum student-teacher ratio for specific grade levels. When ratios are used as support for the argument they are often presented in such a way as to slant the examples in favor of the argument. When such statistics are used for schools, they often represent averages and become very vulnerable to manipulation and further debate. This paper will discuss the issue of small class sizes and the data that has been formulated and presented in the past.

When a class size is large it is often disruptive to the education of the group in general with a diverse field of students with varying degree of learning ability. As a result the class could spend less time with higher academic students in order to keep the less academic students up with the lesson plans or the opposite can occur. Because of this, student-teacher ratios are good arguments for advanced or honors classes. Many analysts have found that extra school resources play a negligible role in improving student achievement while children are in school. Yet many economists have gathered data showing that students who attend well-funded schools grow up to enjoy better job market success than children whose education takes place in schools where resources are limited.

Positive Learning Experience

Having spent my entire K-12 school years in public schools with the maximum allowable class sizes by law my studying the article “The Enduring Effects of Small Classes” provided me with some interesting insight to how my experiences might have affected my early education. I attended...

... middle of paper ...

... the addition of a teacher’s aide. The benefits of small class size are obvious the methods of teaching such a group are not.

Works Cited

Finn, J. D., Gerber, S. B., & Achilles, C. M. (2001). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 103, 145-183.

Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., Achilles, C. M. (2003). The "why's" of class size: Student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research, 73, 321-368.

Clark, A. M., Anderson, R. C., Kuo, L.(2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 181-198.

Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86

More about Analysis of Small Class Sizes

Open Document