Analysis of Kant´s the Critique of Practical Reason

Each epoch gives a birth to its' own heroes. Beginning from the times of the glory of ancient Greece and Roman Empire with Aristotle, Heracles and Aleksander the Great, passing the Dark Ages, when Saint Thomas and Roger Bacon created the eternity and concluding with the creators of modern times – Eddisson and Enshtein, the humankind created idealistic images of their best representatives.

Formally, Kant was the ideological opposer of Newton, the rational genius, who made the knowledge and the mind to exist on the level of the God. Kant, the creator of the first scientific model of the creation of the stars and planets came to the position of limits of practicality morality.

«The Critique of Practical Reason» is the second after «Critique of Pure Reason» work of Kant. In it he describes the «practical activity» contrasted to the prudent practicity. The philosophers of Modern Times supposed that a human mind is the most powerful thing and its' abilities are unlimited, from the laws of the mind the other laws and principles arise. In «Critique of pure reason» Kant comes to the conclusion of limits of the human mind by the sphere of human practice and, what is more primare, its' morality and religion. In «Critique of pure reason» he claims, that the God made the abilities of human mind such, just to stay the place for the religion. This includes also, according to philosopher, that morality is based on the religion, and not vise versa. The practisity of the world of science and politics Kant contrasts the issue of the morality, which is primar with respect thereto.

The morality differs the human-being from the animal. But where did it came from? This is the significant question for Kant. Like the issue of the creation «will is a ...

... middle of paper ...

...iosity of someone more naive.

With cordial greetings,

Your A. Einstein”

It is difficult not to agree with the genius.

For those who may doubt the actuality of the works of the Kant, the example of the accident which took place in the russian town Rostov-na-Donu. As it is written by the newspaper Vesti.ru, the policemen detained a young man on suspicion of shooting at an opponent during a dispute about the work of the philosopher Immanuel Kant. Two young men argued about the work of the philosopher, the dispute raised the emergency of the hassle, and then one of them took the traumatic gun and shot an opponent in the head. Although, it should be pointed out that men with their practical actions were against Kants’ ideas of morality, this is the fate of many brilliant ideas regardless of the time at which they were made, which humanity will be growing long time for.