Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Pros And Cons Of Globalization
Effects of globalization on society
Effects of globalization on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Pros And Cons Of Globalization
The concepts of globalization and localization are considered to be very significant in that they deal with the political, economic, social, and cultural lives of human society. Globalization can be defined as "any technological, psychological, social, economic, or political developments that foster the expansion of interests and practices beyond established boundaries" (Rosenau p. 16). On the other hand, the concept of localization limits or reduces these interests. It is designed to inhibit or prevent the movement of people, goods, information, norms, practices, and institutions outside those specific boundaries. This is mostly related to the social and cultural realms. Politically, globalization enhances the expansion of authority, policies, and interests, whereas localization contracts them to a lesser extent. Economically speaking, globalization favors the expansion of production, trade, and investments, while localization constricts them to a narrower boundary. There are both costs and benefits which can be associated with these two concepts of globalization and localization. Most people feel that globalization has great advantages or benefits and that it is the answer to world unity. This is somewhat true. But along with these benefits, there are also quite a few problems or costs which may coexist. One major problem is that it weakens the administrative power of states. First, borders are no longer boundaries, especially with respect to information, the flow of money, and crime. Second, a number of problems can only be discussed in collaboration with other countries. There is also criticism with respect to corruption and lack of integrity. And finally, some may believe that the state is forced to renounce some of the ac... ... middle of paper ... ... having a particular bounded location of its own. People should worry first about the political, economic, and social conditions they are living in before those of the world’s. I assume they should care more about improving the location around them before wanting to unite the entire world. Although I feel localization is more associated with an individual, I do not at all think globalization should be discontinued. Globalization and localization are two forces coexisting, and if both can simultaneously occur, then why enforce one over the other when both can achieve better realm conditions. BIBLIOGRAPHY Lubbers, R.F.M., The Globalization of Economy and Society, www.globalize.org OECD, Globalization: What Challenges and Opportunities for Governments?, www.oecd.org Rosenau, James N., The Complexities and Contradictions of Globalization, p. 15-19
nations. In my point of view, localism could be a good thing but with many questions which need
Although it already existed long before through primitive trade and migration, globalization has become a major factor in the world organization since the twentieth century. With the creation of transnational companies, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, political and economic associations appeared new powerful actors that cannot be left apart in states’ decisions and whose influence may, according to some, threaten the authority of nation-states. Indeed it can be thought that globalization is causing the end of borders between countries and what is more that it is creating a sort of universal society in which states’ sovereignty is not the main authority anymore. However this essay will try to demonstrate that globalization is not undermining state sovereignty but that it is in fact leading to its transformation and to a new variety of nations. In order to prove it I will first define the main key words and will then focus on the different arguments about the effects of globalization and finally I will demonstrate that globalization has led to a transformation of the concept of state sovereignty.
Globalisation can be construed in many ways. Many sociologists describe it as an era in which national sovereignty is disappearing as a result of a technological revolution, causing space and time to be virtually irrelevant. It is an economic revolution, which Roland Robertson refers to in his book ‘Globalisation’ 1992 pg 8, as “the compression of the world and the intensification of consciousness of the world as a whole”. It is argued that globalisation allows the world to become increasingly more united, with people more conscious of ethnic, societal, civilizational and individual aspects of their lives.
(Bilton et al 1996:5) The process of globalization has certainly had many changing effects to the world we live in; it has also changed the way many factors operate. Globalization is said "to have transformed the structure and scale of human relationships that social, cultural, political, and economic processes now operate at a global scale with a consequent reduction in the significance of other geographical scales. "(The Dictionary of human geography 2004:315) Globalization has had both positive and negative effects on a local, national, international and global level. Globalization often brings benefits at one level which cause negative effects at another, these results and the scale at which they manifest are often uncertain and unpredictable.
Globalization is an overwhelming trend. It is no doubt that there are many positives rise out of globalization, but equally some serious negatives brought from this trend, such as gradual disappearance of ethnic identity (Buckley, 1998). This essay is going to address some positive effects of globalization generally, and then it will focus on impacts of this trend on developing countries.
Globalization can briefly be defined as ‘something’ that affects and changes the traditional arrangements of the state system. It is a term that directly implies change and therefore is a continuos process over a long period of time as compared to quickly changing into a wanted or desir...
Globalization is defined as “the historical process involving a fundamental shift or transformation in the spatial scale of human social organization that links distant communities and expands the reach of power relations across regions and continents (Baylis, 2014).”
Over the last couple of years, the world has become increasingly globalized. After the cold war, all parts of the world were attracted to the process of globalization. The effect of globalization is uneven in different parts of the world and globalization suggests a world full of persistent cultural interaction and exchange, contacts and connection, mixture and movement. Different people view globalization in different ways. Some people feel it has done more good than harm, while others believe it has done more harm than good. This essay will give a deep intuitive understanding of globalization, world systems, and how globalization has affected society, culture, economics, and politics.
Stiglitz, Joseph (2005), “The Overselling of Globalization,” in Bradley A. Thayer, Nuray V. Ibrayomova (eds.), Debates in International Relations (New York: Longman), 86.
Obviously, there are definite costs and benefits to both lines of thinking. According to Rosenau, globalization is "boundary-broadening," a term used to illustrate the spread of goods, people, information, norms and practices, in spite of boundaries. This global integration allows ideas to flow freely from one realm to the next, a definite change from the past. No longer is one limited by the mere physical boundaries that has hampered the growth of a global society for ages. Industries now have greater opportunity to expand into different areas, without fear of possible political instability bringing their businesses to a sudden halt. People can intermingle with other cultures, and become acclimated with all the world has to offer. In addition, the communication gap lessens, allowing those from lands such as Malaysia, to communicate ideas and thoughts as freely as an American would, with the click of a button.
Globalization is a global process that is changing the world. I would also like to discuss what are the benefits and drawbacks of globalization in the world from different perspectives.
Many negative and positive thoughts have been given to the process of globalization. The proponents of globalization rather see the benefits of globalization, while the opponents have based their opinions on the disadvantages of globalization.
There is an undeniable fact that there has been a rise in globalization. It has become a hot topic amongst the field of international politics. With the rise of globalization, the sovereignty of the state is now being undermined. It has become an undisputed fact that the world has evolved to a new level of globalization, the transferring goods, information, ideas and services around the globe has changed at an unimaginable rate. With all that is going on, one would question how globalization has changed the system that is typically a collection of sovereign states. Do states still have the main source of power? What gives a state the right to rule a geographically defined region? It is believed by many that due to the introduction of international systems and increasing rate of globalization, the sovereignty of the state has been slowly eroded over time. My paper has two parts: First, it aims to take a close look at how globalization has changed the way the economy worked, specifically how it opened doors for multinational corporations to rise in power. Second, to answer the question, is it possible for it to exist today? And even so, should it?
Globalisation is a very complex term with various definitions, in business terms, “globalization describes the increasingly global nature of markets, the tendency for transnational businesses to configure their business activities on a worldwide basis, and to co-ordinate and integrate their strategies and operations across national boundaries” (Stonehouse, Campbell, Hamill and Purdie, 2004, p. 5).
Larsson, Thomas. The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization. Cato Institute, 2001.