Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of art in human life
Influence of art on a society
Importance of art in human life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of art in human life
There are many aspects of art, literature, dance, science, etc. that have gotten society to where it is today. We have come from the days where owning a slave was normal, to serving prison time for treating someone unequally. Art has influenced our society ever since the past began being recorded. Cave paintings have been found all over the world. These findings prove people felt the need to express themselves in ways other than words. As far back as ancient times, the motivation for artists to create art is unknown (Janaro 118). However, we do find traces and patterns of imitation, and artists during anytime and age imitating their surroundings in their art (Janaro 118). All places in the world have an understood conduct that must be followed. There are certain behaviors that will be tolerated, and certain behaviors that will not (Barr). Art has seemingly lost a lot of its importance in the current world. Before television, radio, and cell phones art was one of the only forms of entertainment available (Barr). There are so many positive attributes surrounding art. Art is a much more complex way of expressing than simple written words, or speeches. The aspects of any object of art can make anyone think more deeply or critically about what they are actually seeing, or even feeling (Barr).Art has not always been looked upon as a positive influence on today’s society .It has been scorned for challenging opinions, or causing conflict. Art has been so overwhelming to those who do not understand. Socrates was even sentenced to death for supposedly corrupting the youth of his time (Janaro 529). Art in every way adds to the appreciation of our society. There is beauty in everything surrounding us, if you will only take ... ... middle of paper ... ...ieved from http://www.lafterhall.com/power_of_art.html 2. Smith, Nicole. "The Influence of the Renaissance on Modern American Society, Culture and Art." Article Myriad. Article Myriad, 2010. Web. 1 Mar 2011. . 3. Janaro, Richard Paul., and Thelma C. Altshuler. "Conlicts about Art." The Art of Being Human: the Humanities as a Technique for Living. 9th ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2009. 529-56. Print. 4. Janaro, Richard Paul., and Thelma C. Altshuler. "Art." The Art of Being Human: the Humanities as a Technique for Living. 9th ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2009. 118. Print. 5. "History of Art Therapy." AMERICAN ART THERAPY ASSOCIATION. American Art Association, 2011. Web. 02 Mar. 2011. . 6. Fields, Jackie. "Beauty Watch." People Magazine 2011: 109. Print
A lot of people might be doubtful that art has much power to make the world a better place. If you asked they would probably summarize art as scribbles or
In the United States, fine art education in public schools have been a controversial topic for years. Due to fundings, imagine your child had to choose between art or math. Well of course a parent would choose a math course because they would not survive society in their future without counting. Although, fine art gives an opportunity for a student to express themselves with their thoughts and feelings through the participation of the fine arts. As in today’s society everything is consider “art”. That everything could be in fashion styles to the structures of building such as the Space Needle in Seattle.
Art is a language of its own and with out he proper understanding, people are like expression goes “left on the outside looking in”. In other words, people without the proper understanding of art, technique and form as well as other elements can’t appreciate a work of art as much as when you understand why an artist painted in the way they did and what they are trying to get across to his audience. Despite artists attempts to try and make their works as viewer friendly as possible, without the understanding and knowledge gained from an art class as this one people will never fully understand the a work of art as it is meant to be.
Art, unlike other words cannot be characterized by one simple definition; the meaning of art is much more than a surface level interpretation. Over many centuries, art has proved to be a way people can express themselves, plays a role in shaping cultures, and allows for communication through many different ways of expression. Art can either take a lifetime to study or can be as straightforward as graffiti on the side of a popular building. The topic of art has been largely controversial dating back to Mo Tzu, and the wide dispute has only evolved over centuries. There are ways to examine the different realms art touches, and how it has evolved over time. While art is widely discussed in many forms, one thing is for sure, art provides an outlet
Goldwater, Robert and Marco Treves (eds.). Artists on Art: from the XIV to the XX Century. New York: Pantheon Books, 1945.
It is art fulfilling its role in society. It is art that brings the moral issues. It is art that makes us human.
My goal for this paper is to give a practical critique and defense of what I have learned in my time as a Studio Art Major. During my time here I have learned that Pensacola Christian college’s definition of art “art is the organized visual expression of ideas or feelings” and the four parts of Biblosophy: cannon, communication, client, and creativity. Along with Biblosophy I have studied Dr. Frances Schaeffer 's criteria for art, seeing how the technical, and the major and minor messages in artwork. All of these principles are great but they do need to be refined.
Whether it be writers, painters, sculptors, musicians, or photographers, artists all over the world have striven to show people their views of the world, of people, and even of the universe itself. Throughout history the creative urge of man to present to fellow men a different perspective or representation of life-or even the afterlife-has surfaced time and time again in the form of artwork. Sometimes it comes through genius and complexity, full of meaning and symbolism. Others, it is simple and void of any clear meaning at all other than that it is art. Soon, however, there became a point when the work of art was no longer something one could just look at and understand; the principle of the matter had changed. Art leapt from viewable understanding straight into the Modern movement where theory became art, and to understand it, one must know the theory it is based upon. Never was this more apparent than in the artwork of the abstract expressionist. Essentially, artwork is not art because of theory, and art based on theory cannot be creative or truly said to be art.
For over two thousand years, various philosophers have questioned the influence of art in our society. They have used abstract reasoning, human emotions, and logic to go beyond this world in the search for answers about arts' existence. For philosophers, art was not viewed for its own beauty, but rather for the question of how art and artists can help make our society more stable for the next generation. Plato, a Greek philosopher who lived during 420-348 B.C. in Athens, and Aristotle, Plato’s student who argued against his beliefs, have no exceptions to the steps they had to take in order to understand the purpose of art and artists. Though these two philosophers made marvelous discoveries about the existence of art, artists, and aesthetic experience, Plato has made his works more controversial than Aristotle.
I want to take this occasion to address one of the most prominent criticisms of the humanities today. I am not referring to criticism of more recent vintage, which takes to task the humanities for a supposed excess of political correctness; this complaint we can set aside as the ideologically motivated lament that it surely is. Rather, I’m speaking of the more long-standing critique that takes the humanities to task for its inconsequence, its uselessness. The presumption that underwrites this critique is simple: its claim is that we do not learn anything by attending to the objects of humanities research. These objects – a poem, a film or play, a piece of music, or what have you – do not furnish our minds with information we can use. No special knowledge is required to enjoy these objects, and no useable knowledge is furnished through their study.
The. Theories of Contemporary Art. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1985. Kotz, Mary Lynn. Rauschenberg/Art and Life. New York:
Stone, W. F. (1897). Questions on the philosophy of art;. London: Printed by William Clowes and Sons.
Staff Writers. "10 Salient Studies on the Arts in Education." Online Colleges. 6 Sept. 2011. Web. 25 Feb. 2015. .
“Art is a recurring form of human practice. Some have argued that all human societies have shown evidence of artistic activities.” (Carroll 5)
Human’s have always struggled to express themselves. Art, is considered by many to be the ultimate form of human expression. Many assume that art has a definition, but this is not the case. Art, it can be said, is “in the eye of the beholder.” This simply means that what you consider art, someone else would not. Art is part of a person’s internal emotions, which signifies why different people see art as different things. Every type of culture and era presents distinctive and unique characteristics. Different cultures all have different views of what art can, and would be, causing art itself to be universally renowned throughout the world.