The Contribution of the Kushan Empire to Buddhism

1868 Words4 Pages

The material world constantly changes according to the natural law of impermanent. History had shown that while one civilization perished, another develops. However, for some disappeared civilization, vast information remained intact, while other buried in ruins or even no trace is left behind. It is essential to note that without past there would not be possible for current and future. Therefore, history is very important.
According to David Hume:
History is not only a valuable part of knowledge, but opens the door to many other parts, and affords materials to most of the sciences. And indeed, if we consider the shortness of human life, and our limited knowledge, even of what passes in our own time, we must be sensible that we should be forever children in understanding, were it not for this invention, which extends our experience to all past ages, and to the most distant nations; making them contribute as much to our improvement in wisdom, as if they had actually lain under our observation. A man acquainted with history may, in some respect, be said to have lived from the beginning of the world, and to have been making continual additions to his stock of knowledge in every century.
Knowledge of historical civilization indeed is very important. Fortunately, with the help of today’s magic—modern science, we can go back even further into history than we had before. New technology has allowed archeologist to unearth many mysterious artifacts that could change the world history or at least make a contribution to the history of the world. These artifacts added more evidential facts to valuable information that has been left out for thousands of years. The profits found in history can be pin-pointed as of three categories: it amuses ...

... middle of paper ...

...e Monk Fa-Hien of His Travels in India and Ceylon in Search of the Buddhist Books of D. Kessinger Publishing, LLC, 2004.
Liu, Xinru. “Migration and Settlement of the Yuezhi-Kushan: Interaction and Interdependence of Nomadic and Sedentary Societies.” Journal of World History 12, no. 2 (2001): 261–292.
Loeschner, Hans. “The Stūpa of the Kushan Emperor Kanishka the Great, with Comments on the Azes Era and Kushan Chronology.” Sino-Platonic Papers no. 227 (2012): 1–24.
Myer, Prudence R. “Again the Kanishka Casket.” The Art Bulletin 48, no. 3/4 (September 1966): 396. doi:10.2307/3048396.
Puri, B.N. Buddhism in Central Asia. Vol. 4. Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1987.
Rosenfield, John M. The Dynastic Arts of the Kushans. University of California Press, 1967.
Warraich, Mr Tauqeer Ahmad. “Gandhara: An Appriasal of Its Meanings and History.” J.R.S.P., Vol. 48, No. 1 (2011): 1–20.

Open Document