A Critique of Howard S. Becker's Requirements for Cultural Membership

609 Words2 Pages

Culture is something that binds people together and gives people an identity, but does one need to adhere to a set of norms to be a member of a certain culture? If someone deviates from cultural norms, does that mean this person is not a member of their perceived culture? In this essay, I will show that Becker’s argument in Culture: A Sociological View is flawed due to the use of fallacious analogies, historical record of rapid social change and uniqueness of micro social situations.
One of Becker’s first arguments about how culture works from a sociological perspective is based on his analogy between the jazz band and culture at-large. Becker proposes that the way hired jazz musicians who have never played together before perform popular jazz songs well is because knowledge of the songs is assumed in jazz culture, and that this phenomenon is applicable to a myriad of social situations (Becker 196-197). In society, there are many outside factors that make Becker’s example unique. For instance, the jazz musicians could hail from different socioeconomic backgrounds. The saxophonist could be a middle class white male, while the trombonist could be a working class African American female. In a genre of music where improvisation and personal style create many variations of the same song, these factors could cause differing interpretations between the musicians. The African American female trombonist could play the same song in a different style than the white male saxophonist because they perhaps learned the song from different types of people in different settings. Therefore, for Becker’s example to be valid, the players must learn the song in the same fashion within a vague and wide ranging jazz culture.
Also, Becker propos...

... middle of paper ...

...ourtship, while many younger Americans adhere to subcultures that challenge the mainstream cultural expectations of courtship.
In conclusion, Becker’s argument concerning cultural interaction in his article, Culture: A Sociological Viewpoint, is flawed because of the use of fallacious analogies, historical record of rapid social change and uniqueness of micro social situations. Becker fails to acknowledge the diverse array of subcultures within larger cultures that challenge social norms as well as the diversity of socioeconomic factors that can alter a person’s life experience and decision making within a culture. In short, one does not need to adhere to cultural norms to be a member of a wider culture such as American culture.

Works Cited

Becker, Howard S. “Culture: A Sociological View” Course Reader for Sociology 210 at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Open Document