Comparing The Works Of Edgar Allen Poe And Emily Dickinson

1008 Words3 Pages

Although difficult and challenging, I have compared and contrasted the works of two American Poets, Edgar Allen Poe and Emily Dickinson, based on literary elements used in their writings. Their differences both in style and subject are contradictory to the fact that both Poe and Dickinson are writers/poets of the same personal nature. The use of literary elements showcase the iconic statuses of the writings created by such reserved yet fame dependent poets such as Poe and Dickinson. To an extent, their chosen elements are what create their uniqueness. Further, it establishes a uniform perception that they are similar yet different poets of the personal essence. Through their writings, readers are able to grasp the concept that they are rarely drawn to the fact their lives were perfect. Dickinson seemed to be a writer of distinct but subtle characteristics. Poe, on the other hand, was considered to be a writer filled with a dependancy on fame and fortune.
In comparison, Edgar Allen Poe and Emily Dickinson share the exploration of the same themes including but limited to aspects of life, love, death, and concerns for civilization. For example, Poe’s “The Conqueror Worm” is all about death and how it occurs. The last stanza of the poem starting with “Out-out are the lights-out all!” Poe portrays the fact that the narrator is about to experience pain which occurs after the body has decomposed. (Edgar Allen Poe) Poe’s “The Raven” uses imagery to convey death; “And the silken sad uncertain rustling of each purple curtain” (Edgar Allen Poe). In Dickinson’s “Because I could Not Stop for Death,” she speaks of death as does Poe in his writings. She includes that she has been approached by death and it has come to take her “for the eterna...

... middle of paper ...

... Dickinson, on the other hand, was a free-style writer. She was carefree of how her writings do not include any type of meter or structure. She did not use standard punctuation. Instead, she referred to the use of dashes, unsystematic capitalization, and broken meter. It is not clear as to why she chose such a unique style of writing, but it worked for her. She was not concerned with correctness but with structure that would include considerate features. In “Defrauded I a Butterfly,” Dickinson left little room for meter or style used from European models in her time being it only consisted on two lines. Also, in “I’m Nobody! Who Are You?” the reader may recognize that the she did not use a traditional rhyme scheme that would usually be able to identify in poetry. She used AABC instead of the more noticeable and most often used ABAB or a more rare scheme ABCB.

Open Document