Compare And Contrast Maslow And Rogers

1113 Words3 Pages

Person-Situations Interactions Two proponents most noted for humanistic approaches to personality are Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers. Both the Person-Centered Theory (Rogers) and the Hierarchy of Needs (Maslow) considered that humans ' true nature was good and that each has the potential for growth. A comparison of the two approaches demonstrates a compatibility between theory and practice. Furthermore, each approach focuses on individual choices and rejects the theory that biology will determine human potential. Compare person-centered theory with Maslow 's hierarchy of needs. The hierarchy of needs and person-centered theory share humanistic psychology’s approach toward the person. In the Abraham Maslow hierarchy of needs, humans satisfy …show more content…

According to Maslow, a person must achieve each level before they can move onto the next. If all levels are not met then, they will not achieve self-actualization. If someone did not have their physiological needs met their personality could be affected and cause particular neuroses (Cloninger, 2013). An example would be if they were without food they could then become obsessed and begin to hoard food. Safety is the next level of Maslow 's hierarchy. When a person 's need to feel safe is not met they can be untrusting of new individuals or situations. The inability to trust can affect relationships, both personal and professional because of their guarded personality trait (Cloninger, 2013). Lack of self-esteem can be a result of little recognition or approval. The person’s lack of self-esteem may affect their personality in a way that the person is timid and shy. A person may be fearful of new experiences because they do not believe they will be successful. Feelings of low self-esteem will inhibit them from achieving the level of self-actualization, which includes morality, creativity, problem solving and acceptance of facts (Cloninger, 2013). The main components of person-centered theory that contribute to personality …show more content…

Roger’s believed that our self-worth develops from interactions with our parents during childhood. A person 's self-worth will affect relationships with friends, partners, or work (McLeod, 2007). Roger’s believed that we need to feel positively regarded by others. Positive regard is how we are judged and viewed by others. Unconditional positive regard is when a person feels free to make choices and mistakes without fear of losing the positive regard. Conditional positive regard is when a person feels they will only be regarded positively when they act or behave in the way a parent or another person believes is appropriate. If a person seeks approval regularly, then, according to Rogers they likely only received conditional positive regard (McLeod, 2007). The closer ideal self and the real self are to each other the higher a person’s sense of self-worth. Our ideal self is who we wish to be, and the real self is who we are. When there is an imbalance between who we want to be and who we are, a person can develop defense mechanisms to try to alter the real self (McLeod,

Open Document